The government that Locke proposes is always accountable to the community, and the community has the power to change or displace the legislative and executive powers.
Their ideas are countered by the democratic optimism of Locke and Rousseau. In divulging the philosophies of John Locke, Mosely indicated that one must take into account the historic events influencing the life and works of Locke. Thomas Jefferson saw and understood this.
In addition, Locke pointed out, reformists should be as suspect as the uneducated masses because the masses can be duped into thinking they are fighting for a cause, where the reformists could trick the masses into obtaining power and control for the reformist.
Although, people should not follow blindly, but willingly.
Unlike Hobbes, Locke believes that man has the capacity to live in peace by refraining from hurting other and from molesting or invading their properties.
How to cite this page Choose cite format: Hobbes establishes a science that explains humanity at a physics like level of motion. In respects to equality, since we all are owing our lives and rights to this creator and we are not God and so are subject to death, this makes all of us equal.
Hobbes garnered recognition in several areas; he was the champion of absolutism for the sovereign, but greatly contributed to many other subjects as well, including ethics, geometry, physics of gases, theology, and even political science.
The reason man forms government is for self preservation and this government is perpetuated by fear. How is that fear instilled?
Rather than having human nature rooted in individualism, our nature is governed by natural laws which are set by this creator. According to him, a prince is safer if he is feared rather than loved.
Sadly there is some ambiguity about the definition of these rights, but there are at least three that are well know.
Consequently, Locke points to the idea that the responsibility of uniting and taking care of the needs of the whole community lies in the hands of the people and not on the sole control of one person. Many other theorists during Hobbes lifetime called him a lunatic and crazy.
For Hobbes, the right thing for man to do is to shut up and obey and once this is done, anyone does not have the right to kill the obedient one. People are egotistical because when push comes to shove, people will do anything they can to secure their physical safety and ensure their own survival.
We still have our full liberties with us and security measures are implemented in order to regain one thing we have lost in the attack: Works Cited Deutsch, Kenneth L.Thomas Hobbes (5 April – 4 December ) and John Locke (29 August – 28 October ) differed not only in philosophical systems and period but also in temperament, with Hobbes' worldview being significant more pessimistic than.
Jun 13, · He became famous when his book, “Leviathan,” laid the foundation of Western political philosophy.
Hobbes garnered recognition in several areas; he was the champion of absolutism for the sovereign, but greatly contributed to many other subjects as well, including ethics, geometry, physics of gases, theology, and even political /5(4).
Comparing John Locke and Thomas Hobbes Essay - The formation of government is one of the central themes for both Hobbes and Locke. Whether or not men naturally form a government, or must form a government, is based on man’s basic nature.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke have authored two works that have had a significant impact on political philosophy. In the “Leviathan” by Hobbes and “Two Treatises of Government” by Locke, the primary focus was to analyze human nature to determine the most suitable type of government for humankind.
The competing political philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke represent the disparate governments that were present across 17th-century Europe.
For example, the absolute monarchy espoused by Thomas Hobbes was alive and well in the centralized monarchy of Louis XIV's France, while the conditional rule and social contract theory. Excerpt from Term Paper: Philosophies Comparison of Locke, Machiavelli, Hobbes and Rousseau The philosophies of Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau encompass a spectrum of thought on how a state should be governed.Download